six demon bag
Wind, fire, all that kind of thing!
Posted here, since the Fedora people apparently can't be bothered to fix their documentation.
In January 2016 I came across this question on StackOverflow, asking about an OutOfMemory error when validating the SHA256 checksum of a Fedora ISO image. The Fedora documentation suggested reading the full file and then calculating the checksum from the bytes:
Why anyone would even want to read an entire ISO image into memory for a checksum calculation is beyond me. The recommended way of doing this is to open the file as a stream and calculate the checksum on that stream:
Posted 00:53 [permalink]
To prevent the AVAHI daemon on Debian systems from running without actually uninstalling the package
avahi-daemon or touching the runlevels do this:
touch /var/run/avahi-daemon/disabled-for-unicast-local sed -i 's/^#\?\(AVAHI_DAEMON_DETECT_LOCAL\)=.*/\1=1/' /etc/default/avahi-daemon service restart avahi-daemon
I've seen people suggest putting a line
exit 0 into
/etc/default/avahi-daemon, but I wouldn't recommend that, because it would prevent not only starting the daemon, but also stopping it.
Posted 15:35 [permalink]
Barracuda Networks provide agents for their backup appliance for various operating systems. Unfortunately the Linux agent (unlike the Windows agent) does not come with an option for a silent installation, and it doesn't look like the vendor can be bothered to do anything about it.
Instead of being able specify a path on the commandline (or at least force a silent installaton to the default path) you're always prompted for the path where the agent should be installed:
/tmp # tar xzf barracuda_backup_agent-x.x.x.tar.gz /tmp # cd barracuda_backup_agent-x.x.x /tmp/barracuda_backup_agent-x.x.x # ./install Please choose an installation path, or press enter for default. [/usr/local/barracuda/bbs]: _
Posted 01:13 [permalink]
SeaMonkey is my preferred web browser, because I'm quite comfortable with its user interface. However, some of my favorite extensions (namely text/plain and ReloadEvery) claim to be incompatible when trying to install them, although they actually work just fine with SeaMonkey. Here's how you can convince an extension that SeaMonkey is totally fine for installation.
Posted 19:58 [permalink]
When setting up RedHat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) or CentOS systems I always find it handy to have a local repository with the RPMs from the install media. On hosts without Internet connection it saves me the trouble of having to shuffle install media around whenever I need to install an additional package after the system was initially set up. Even if the host is configured to use an online repository, keeping a local repository doesn't hurt except for a little extra disk space, which is cheap enough these days.
Posted 16:30 [permalink]
Although IBM doesn't officially support its TSM client on Linux distributions other than SLES and RHEL the client works quite nicely on Debian. With version 6.4 you need at least the following 4 packages on AMD64 systems:
Posted 00:46 [permalink]
On Linux you can mount disk images via loopback devices. Partitions inside disk images can be made accessible via
kpartx from the multipath-tools. Unfortunately this does not work for VirtualBox disk images (.vdi). It's possible to loop-mount those disk images as network block devices, though.
Posted 01:53 [permalink]
On Linux you can simply store a server's public key in your
known_hosts file to avoid being prompted for host key verification. However, PuTTY stores server public keys in a different format, so you can't simply import a public key into the Windows registry and be done with it. You can convert
known_hosts files to .reg file format with this script from the PuTTY homepage, but unfortunately the script doesn't account for entries that use a non-default port:
[a.b.c.d]:2222 ssh-rsa AAAA...
This patch fixes the issue. You can also download an already patched version of the script.
Update: The official version of
kh2reg.py has been updated.
Posted 22:00 [permalink]
Dual-booting Windows 9x and Windows 2000
(Windows 2000 installed first)
Let's say you would like to install Windows 9x and Windows 2000 on the same computer and make the system dual-boot. What would be the right order to install the operating systems?
Microsoft suggests to install Windows 9x first and Windows 2000 afterwards. Although this is the easy way I suggest not to do so. The procedure will install the bootloader on the Windows 9x partition where it cannot be protected by NTFS ACLs (the FAT filesystems do not support permissions). Maybe you have heard that installing Windows 9x first was the only possibility to dual-boot Windows 9x and 2000. Rest assured that's nothing but an urban legend. It is possible, although not as simple as the other way.
Posted 12:49 [permalink]